DBAV Alert and News

When United States President Barack Obama swore to office last January 20, 2009, gun control advocates can only rejoice at the prospect of having a staunch supporter to their cause.

Now, they are giving the 1-year incumbent president every failing grade possible.

Gun control advocates say that Mr. Obama has failed to deliver the gun control promises he made during his presidency campaign. Nowhere was the campaign promise that he made to close an exploit that allows dealers sell firearms without federal background checks or criminal background checks. He has been largely nonexistent while several gun right promoters made strong pushes to expanded gun rights.

The past years had been witness to several attempts by both gun control advocates and their second amendment counterparts. Now a new bill has been passed by Utah state legislature that has caused much controversy. The proprietor and sponsor of the controversial gun bill, Senator Margaret Dayton, claims that the purpose of the Bill is to limit the federal government's control over the states and its citizen's right.

The bill proposes that all firearms stored, manufactured or constructed in the state should be exempt from any federal regulations. This means that dealers will not be required to acquire licenses for firearms bought and made within the state, this also may mean that buyers will no longer go through background checks using the FBI Instant Criminal Background Check System, allowing anyone; include convicted felons to freely purchase firearms.

A recent New York divorce case sparked interest among law aficionados as well as public opinions. New York Family Court Judge, Debra J. Kiedaisch, had ruled in favor of a man who had hired a private detective to run background checks, investigate and trail his cheating wife to a motel.

The private investigator was able to take footage of the man's cheating spouse having an affair inside the motel with a local priest, who was named only as "Father L.", the priest was assigned to the church where the man's wife worked and was also attended regularly by the man's family, together with every Sunday for mass.

The man's wife filed for divorce back in November of 2008, claims were filed by the husband against her accusing her of having an affair, and on February 26, 2009, an order of protection or restraining order was issued by the courts as requested by the wife, restricting the husband from going near her, and to stay at least 1,000 feet away from the women's residence, workplace except for visitations and church.